Divorce Asset Division Trends.jpg
원본 (Korean)
Translation + Context
FT = ForbiddenTome — tap to see Korean slang explained
A clearer image, or
The original text retyped correctly, or
Clarification on what the source material actually says
**Clear, legible source text** - either a cleaner image or properly formatted Korean text
**Context** - what is the source material (social media, article, transcript)?
Between Marriage and Divorce. Attorney Yang So-young, How I Became an Adult: Property Division is a Money Game
Apartment Pre-sale Lottery Win Case "Kim Eun and Lee Eun-saeyoung + Young Attorney
Dirk
How I Became an Adult: Property Division is a Money Game [Issue Analysis] 'Comprehensive Property Tax 2% Plan' Abolished but Controversy Remains… Housing Prices Hit All-Time High Seoul Weekly Apartment Price Increase Rate, Highest in Half a Year Busan Apartment Average Price Up 9.39%… Gijang-gun Up 14.23% Max 'Housing Price Surge Train' Becomes Metropolitan Rail Can Regional Areas Also Benefit? Experts Say "Effects Will Be Limited" "Don't Even Look At" That Neighborhood Lost 200 Million Won in Housing Prices in Just a Year Between Marriage and Divorce. Attorney Young, How I Became an Adult: Property Division is a Money Game! Dirk
Apartment Premium Rise Kim Eun and Lee Eun-sai. Attorney Yang So-young, How I Became an Adult: Property Division is a Money Game!
Dirk
Subject to Property Division Includes Both Stocks Purchased Before Marriage, Real Estate That Increased After Marriage are also Subject to Division (*Vehicles Purchased Before Marriage are also Subject to Division) So Then.... Between Marriage and Divorce. Attorney Yang So-young
Dirk
How I Became an Adult: Property Division is a Money Game!
Can Cryptocurrency Also Be Subject to Property Division? Between Marriage and Divorce This Famous Place Young Byeon Ho
Dirt
How I Became an Adult: Division is a Money Game!
This Coin, Which Reflects the Times and is Said to be Very Hot, Will It Be Divided?
Marriage and divorce with lawyer Young-so Young
Diss/Critique
Suddenly Adult's asset division is a money game!
Sufficient property division [is|가능]] - however much 가능, the result is between Young-so and Young lawyer
Diss/Critique
Suddenly Adult's asset division is a money game!
One spouse was able to buy cryptocurrency between marriage and divorce with Young-so Young + Young lawyer
Diss/Critique
Suddenly Adult's asset division is a money game
Thanks to the other spouse's effort and contribution, between marriage and divorce with Young-so + Young lawyer
Diss/Critique
Suddenly Adult's asset division is a money game
Of course asset division applies! Because of this "contribution to maintaining [assets|을]]" that keeps coming up, division [is possible|가능]] (this "contribution to maintenance" is really ambiguous because... a full-time housewife can receive asset division with just the title of "homemaker" even if she doesn't properly do housework and childcare, whereas a man who doesn't work outside becomes grounds for divorce and becomes liable. Between marriage and divorce, lawyer Yang So-young. Diss/Critique. Suddenly Adult's asset division is a money game!
Underground economy assets like cryptocurrency
A clearer image of the original Korean text, or
The original Korean text retyped correctly
Between Marriage and Divorce. Yang So-young Attorney
Dick
How Did I Become an Adult - Property Division is a Money Game!
(Premonition)
(Sad)
Marriage and Divorce - So-young Attorney
Dick
How Did I Become an Adult - Property Division is a Money Game
Property Division possible! Exceptionally, as always ~ 'contributed to maintaining [the household]' - under this pretext, even savings insurance that the husband paid in full becomes a subject of property division. Let me explain with an easy example: Example 1 • After 15 years of marriage, the husband (single income earner) • pays monthly into savings-type insurance (pension insurance, etc.) Current surrender value: 20 million won → Upon divorce, the value of this insurance (20 million won) is property formed during marriage, so the stay-at-home wife can receive about 10 million won (half). Reason: Our court's basic stance is that the husband's income is also seen as a result of the couple's joint efforts. --> It's a catch-all thing ㄷㄷ Contributing to maintaining [the household] - But!! There's property that doesn't get divided, dick, dark, age, Attorney Yang-young, How Did I Become an Adult - Property Division is a Money Game!
There's property that's not a subject of division? That is, right away!!
A clearer, higher-quality image of the original text
Or the original Korean text copied directly (not OCR'd)
Marriage and Divorce. Attorney Yang So-young
Like/Subscribe
"Accidentally Adult" - Is a husband's 2 billion won lottery win subject to property division?
It's NOT joint property! Marriage and Divorce - Attorney Yang So-young "Accidentally Adult" - Property division is a money game!
Like/Subscribe
Lottery winnings are 'NOT subject to property division! Basically, a man has to win the lottery to avoid property division it's possible ^^^^
Marriage and Divorce, Attorney Young
Like/Subscribe
"Accidentally Adult" - Korea's marriage rate: 4.2 per 1,000 people
Pre-marital cohabitation is also becoming a trend. Result: Attorney Sai Young + Young
Like/Subscribe
"Accidentally Adult" - Hot issue keywords in unmarried topics 2. The truth is
Common-law marriage also allows for property division & alimony claims upon divorce. Even a common-law marriage without official registration allows property division and alimony claims it's possible ^^ Marriage and Divorce HOL UK Young Attorney Like/Subscribe "Accidentally Adult" - Husband's 2 billion won lottery win, is it subject to property division?
So loans don't count toward the split apparently...?
Period Cramps Are Harder Than Military Boot Camp
87143 hours ago
The audacity of calling BJ streamers 'underground' content is ridiculous lol
93183 hours ago
It's hilarious how people call BJs 'underground' content lol
111163 hours agoDivorce Asset Division Trends.jpg
91333 hours ago
Young guys claiming they've done Yas 100 times more than 2030
148141 day ago
Today marks Coyote's 10,000th day since debut
125181 day ago
We agreed to split the lottery winnings equally, but my friend was the one who won
9854 days ago
Breathtaking Twin-Tailed Girl
8759 days ago
Choi Daniel Gets Properly Scratched While His Underwear Exposed During Gymnastics.gif
9759 days ago
??? : Marriage got harder because of 'feminism'.mp4
14359 days ago
12 comments
The nation basically says "if the woman ends up poorer and has worse credentials, don't even look at her!!!" So that's why getting a girlfriend or wife is easier now when you're a jobless NEET—because women's pickiness goes down! 😏
Why would that be? The woman's assets get split in half too though.
In this damn country where marrying up is the default mindset, how many cases are there where the woman earns more and has more assets?
Seriously all these comments sound crazy. So women should just marry, dedicate themselves to family, and even if their husband causes the divorce, they should just take whatever salary they earned like a maid and leave? That's what you're saying?
Plus there are cases where the guy messes things up so bad he doesn't even get custody but the split is still the same percentage. And in-laws get treated like absolute villains but then suddenly claim their inheritance share—that's weird too.
Usually women save way less money than guys lol.
That's why you shouldn't marry girls who come with a 30 million won dowry package.
This is why you gotta marry someone at the same level. If the guy brings 1 billion won, the girl has to bring exactly 1 billion won too. When guys say "my girlfriend is different, my wife is trustworthy," and you make exceptions to that rule—that's when you get hit with the "5 years of promises" curse. Do people getting married think they're gonna divorce? Everyone dreams of a happy marriage.
That's why people aren't getting married—marriage and having kids is becoming exclusive to the rich. Even dating is becoming something only rich people can afford.
Rich people have more to lose so without homogamy they'd rather not get married.
Statistically men do earn more, that's true, but the focus should be on how the legal system is messed up, not on "men have to hit the lottery for assets not to be split as public property." The problem is the inadequate legal framework—why does this program keep trying to divide men and women?
Programs need conflict and sensational topics to get views, and lawyers need to emphasize disputes to make themselves seem necessary and get paid lol.
What if the woman earns and the man does housework? Same right?
Yeah same. Sometimes the woman gets stripped of everything. That's not gender discrimination—it's that the law still reflects how people lived in the 70s-80s...
Korea has the weakest tendency toward homogamy among major countries (women have the strongest tendency to marry up). So the point "just marry a wife who makes more than you" doesn't really land... "Korea has the lowest rate of 'income homogamy' where men and women of nearly equal income form households among major countries."
You're not even married yet and you're already thinking about divorce? What satisfaction is there in a life like that? People who think about the future become slaves to the future.
If you don't think about anything and just live, you disappear like Meursault at the gallows.
《But one day will come when we must take leave of this hour. We live looking toward the future. 'Tomorrow,' 'later,' 'when you settle down,' 'when you grow older, you'll understand.' Such contradiction is absurd. The future only leads to death after all.〔…〕Tomorrow—he was waiting for tomorrow. He should have refused with his entire being. This rebellion of the body is the absurd.》 『The Myth of Sisyphus』 - Albert Camus《One thing I remember: the ward nurse spoke to me at the entrance of the village. She had a strange voice that didn't match her face—sweet and trembling. She said, 'If you walk too slowly you'll get heatstroke, if you walk too fast you'll sweat and get chills inside the church.' She was right. There was no way out.》 『The Outsider』 - Albert Camus《Why would I deny the joy of life before this world? But I don't think life's pleasure is everything either. There's nothing shameful about being happy. But today fools reign. I call a fool anyone who fears enjoying himself.》『The First Man』 - Albert Camus
Acknowledging contribution itself is the problem? So that means housewives (regardless of gender) should get nothing and be kicked out after divorce? There is some overcorrection going on, I'll admit, but denying contribution entirely makes no sense.
That's why we consider who's at fault.
Shouldn't debt be split 50-50 too?
Yeah...
Cut the bullshit talk—nobody's saying don't acknowledge contribution. They're saying it's excessive. That's the point, not whatever nonsense you're spouting.
If you wanna be picky, you should base it on the modern trend of dual income and go from there. Without specific circumstances—like losing limbs or getting a rare disease—if someone becomes a housewife just months into marriage and does solo housework for years, there's no reason to acknowledge that as value contribution to assets. If there's a kid and they became a housewife to raise the child? Still not enough justification. You'd claim child support from the guy anyway in a divorce right?
Really? Guess I misread it.
Homogamy prevents these issues from popping up in the first place. And child support is a different concept from asset division—it's about both parents sharing child-rearing costs.
What is it... in places like the US they recognize prenups where you agree not to split assets in case of divorce but in Korea that's apparently not recognized.
What's the problem? Just become a housewife lol. The annoying part is singling out one gender specifically. If those benefits only apply to housewives, then just join the housewife team.
I'm a lawyer and I've handled divorce cases. Honestly it doesn't really feel like one gender is inherently disadvantaged. But divorce is a special kind of family case where there aren't many clear-cut legal divisions, so the judge's personal tendencies play a bigger role than other cases. I think that's a bigger problem than gender bias—it's more about the reliability of the court system itself depending on individual judges.
There's a saying "5 years of promises, 3 years of value for money" but what makes you think one gender isn't disadvantaged? Most men earn more income, so why would you think otherwise? Give us some evidence here.
Random question but there's a lot of international marriages these days—when a Korean and foreigner get divorced, does the judge rule favorably for the Korean person regarding asset division? Or just normal judgment? I mean it's basically sending domestic capital overseas but judges probably don't care about that right?
Just because people say that doesn't mean it's actually true.
But what advantage does the guy have in asset division? What advantage does the guy have in custody? If guys have zero advantages, how can you say divorce actually isn't unfair to them? Back up your claims with evidence.